|
Consulting with John Stanford International School
by Michele Anciaux Aoki, Ph.D.
In 1997, I was invited by Karen Kodama, then principal at TOPS K-8
school in Seattle, to be part of the planning group for the first
international school in Seattle. Karen had been hand-picked by
Superintendent John Stanford to take his vision of a place where all
children were learning languages and learning about each other's cultures
and turn it into a real school. I participated in a number of initial
planning meetings before being hired by Karen in January of 2000 to
consult with the school on developing and launching the international
school and their language immersion program. Here is a summary and
timeline of the work I have completed for the school.
Jump to: Planning |
Launching | Developing
Partnerships | Expanding |
Evaluating | ELLOPA |
Publications
Planning the School
I was a volunteer member of the Planning and Outreach committees for
the school, beginning in 1999. I recorded and disseminated summaries of
the meetings in order to keep the rather disparate group of teachers,
professors, and community members engaged. If
Here are links to Meeting Notes:
Feb. |
22, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
|
Mar. |
15, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(District commitment and Visibility) |
Mar. |
29, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Plans for website) |
Apr. |
5, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Business survey, Marketing, Outreach) |
Apr. |
19, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Outreach at Ethnic Heritage Council) |
May |
10, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Plans to meet with Marilyn Hawkins about creating school brand) |
May |
23, |
1999 |
Marketing Meeting Notes
(Main marketing message and audiences) |
May |
24, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Communications plan and public awareness) |
June |
28, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Business survey results (top languages now: Spanish & Japanese; in
10 years: Mandarin; Landor Branding Consultants; Fundraising) |
July |
26, |
1999 |
Committee Notes
(Brochure by Landor) |
Sep. |
2, |
1999 |
PR Meeting Notes
(Website, Fundraising, PR, etc.) |
Oct. |
4, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Partnership Action Team) |
Oct. |
7, |
1999 |
Marketing Meeting Notes
(Website topics) |
Oct. |
12, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Website structure) |
Nov. |
1, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Adoption of new Social Studies Curriculum, Fundraising, PR, etc.) |
Nov. |
22, |
1999 |
Port Ludlow Retreat
(UW Partnership; School, Family, Community Partnerships; World
Language Standards) |
Nov. |
29, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Updates, Starting Points Survey) |
Nov. |
30, |
1999 |
National Standards for Foreign Language
(The 5 "C's" - Communication, Culture, Connections, Comparisons,
Communities) |
Dec. |
6, |
1999 |
Meeting Notes
(Culture notes, Starting Points survey) |
Dec. |
9, |
1999 |
Ground Breaking Ceremony
(Highlights of the ceremony at Latona School) |
Jan. |
19, |
2000 |
Marketing Meeting Notes
(Options for non-profit status) |
Feb. |
28, |
2000 |
Meeting Notes
(Partnership updates; Michele's visits to DC area immersion
programs) |
Apr. |
17, |
2000 |
Meeting Notes
(Adoption of Tahoma Social Studies Curriculum, Report on Primary
Years Program, TESOL Conference) |
Apr. |
17, |
2000 |
Notes on the Primary Years Programme Planner:
(Organizing Themes and Stages of the Planner) |
My work as a paid consultant to the school began in January, 2000.
January, 2000
I completed on-site visits to two elementary, dual language immersion
programs in Virginia and Maryland, meeting with the principals and
teachers, visiting classrooms, reviewing curriculum, and talking with
their staff about our plans for John Stanford International School. I
completed reports based on questions generated by Karen and her
teachers:
Decision Point: Karen and the staff decided
to implement a partial immersion model (half-day Spanish and half-day
English), with separation of languages (Spanish taught by Spanish-only
teacher), focusing on Math and Science as the content areas taught in
Spanish.
Note: we
discussed the desirability of offering a dual or two-way immersion
program (with 50% Spanish native speakers), but because of the
District's Assignment Plan, we were not allowed to offer preferential
assignment to the school to Spanish native speakers. Our hope, by
co-locating the Bilingual Orientation Center at the school, was that
some native speakers from the BOC might transition into the partial
immersion program when spots opened in the upper grades.
March - June, 2000
In March, 2000, we set up the World Languages
Planning Team, including representatives from John Stanford and the
University of Washington. I coordinated the meetings and sent out
communications. My focus was on ensuring that the immersion program
would be standards-based. In addition, I worked with the Spanish teacher
to plan how to develop appropriate Math and Science curriculum for the
immersion program.
-
Meeting Notes: March 2, 2000 (first meeting)
-
Meeting Notes: March 9, 2000
(meeting to plan organization of resources)
-
Meeting Notes: March 15, 2000
(approach to planning K-1 Math & Science curriculum in Spanish)
-
Meeting Notes: April 5, 2000
(curriculum planning, including the Primary Years Program)
-
Survey of State Standards: April 19, 2000
(review of other states' World Languages Standards to identify
resources that would be helpful to us)
-
Meeting Notes: April 20, 2000
(issues concerning the Math and Science curriculum in Spanish
-
Curriculum Planner Models: May 2, 2000
(report on different curriculum planners from PYP, Dual Language
programs, World Language Frameworks, Math books, etc.)
-
Curriculum Planner for JSIS: May 10, 2000
(notes on recommended template for John Stanford to use)
-
Meeting Notes: May 11, 2000
(planning meeting to discuss Math curriculum)
-
Compact for Reading in Spanish: May 18, 2000
(review of Dept. of Ed Compact for Reading
http://www.ed.gov/pubs/CompactforReading/index.html with
recommendations for modifications to use the Spanish version in the
immersion program)
August, 2000
The highlight of the summer was a four-day "Language
Immersion Boot Camp" presented by Regla Armengol, a teacher-of-the-year
from Virginia who taught in a partial immersion program in Fairfax
County and also worked with native Spanish speaking students on literacy
in Spanish after school. I coordinated and planned the workshop with
Regla, then took extensive notes so that we would be able to share the
learning in future years. While we began the workshop developing a
strong theoretical understanding of language acquisition, we ended with
concrete nuts-and-bolts, like how to create a letter home to parents.
September, 2000
During the first weeks of school, I developed a number
of tools to help teachers communicate well with parents about the
expectations of the program. See, for example:
Early on in the planning stages, I recommended to Karen
that the school join the National Network of Partnership Schools (the
first Seattle school to do so). In August, 2000, I presented a one-day
workshop on Action Teams for School, Family, Community Partnerships to
launch the school's Action Team. The Action Team used data from its
Starting Points Survey (carried out the previous spring) to identify top
priority areas to work on in the school.
For an overview on School-Family-Community Partnerships, see:
Throughout the first year -- and continuing to this day -- the Action
Team for School, Family, Community Partnerships has focused on helping the
school succeed in its mission of connecting all of its families in
meaningful ways to the school and developing full support from the
business community.
During winter, 2001, Karen hired me to coordinate the
interview process for a Japanese immersion teacher. That process led to
hiring of Mihoko Tsang, who proved to be an outstanding teacher.
My contract with John Stanford International School
continued throughout the first year as I helped the school evaluate the
program.
September, 2000 - June, 2001
An important part of implementing a new program, such as the Spanish
language partial immersion program, is to evaluate how it is going.
Throughout the first year of the program, we took steps to reflect on
the results of the program and the experiences of the people involved.
More important, we used these reflections to guide us in what to do to
improve the program.
The program evaluation includes both qualitative and quantitative
aspects. Qualitative elements include looking at attitudes and
experiences, for example, through questions at parent and staff
meetings, and responses to surveys and questionnaires. Quantitative
elements include looking at student achievement in Math and Science, as
demonstrated by classroom work and assessments (tests). To evaluate how
much Spanish language the children have acquired each year, we conducted
special oral language interviews with the help of experts in assessing
early language learning from CAL (Center for Applied Linguistics) in
Washington, DC.
The links below will help you trace our progress in evaluating the
Language Immersion Program. (The documents below are in PDF format which
allows you to view them electronically on most computers. The freely
available Adobe Acrobat reader is required to view and print PDF files.)
Family Questionnaire #1 distributed fall, 2000
(TIF) |
Parent Meeting October 10, 2000 |
Portfolio Planning with Dr. Stephen Kerr |
Concerns from Staff Meeting December 22, 2000
|
Language and Math meeting with Regla Armengol
January 18, 2001 |
Observations from Regla Armengol January 19, 2001 |
Program Evaluation Outline - January 23, 2001 |
Concerns from Staff Meeting Dec 22, 2000:
January 31, 2001 milestones
|
Program Evaluation Planning - February 5, 2001
|
Program Evaluation Planning - February 6, 2001 |
Program Evaluation Planning -
July 26, 2001 |
Concerns from Staff Meeting Dec 22, 2000:
March 31, 2001 milestones
|
Concerns from Staff Meeting Dec 22, 2000:
May 31, 2001 milestones
|
I arranged for the first formal language proficiency
assessment at the school in spring, 2001, by a team from the Center for
Applied Linguistics. The following spring, I developed a one-day overview
workshop for teachers (and instructional assistants and several UW grad
students) with Dr. Manka Varghese at the UW. I then arranged for the CAL
trainer to spend two days working directly with the teachers (and IAs),
coaching them on their interviewing and rating skills.
In 2003, I again conducted training sessions for the teachers. (In 2004
and 2005, the teachers were able to arrange their own peer training.) Each
year, I have coordinated the data collection and statistical analysis and
reporting.
For a summary of results from the first two years of
assessment, see:
Note: I expect to make data
from the 2005 assessments available soon, after the teachers at the school
have had a chance to review the results.
I have published (with Sue Ranney) two articles about John
Stanford International School and Hamilton International Middle School in
New Horizons for Learning (www.newhorizons.org):
- John
Stanford International School in Seattle
An article in New Horizons for Learning spring, 2001 that
describes the immersion program launched at John Stanford International
School in fall, 2000.
-
International Public Schools in Seattle
An article in New Horizons for Learning spring, 2004 that
describes the evolution of the Seattle international public schools and
current status of language immersion in Spanish and Japanese at John
Stanford International School.
|